USPTO serial 77422889
ULTIMATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAHLING, KRISTIN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTIMATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kefar Saba, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori S. Kozak
LORI S. KOZAK BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD7TH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90025Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus for wireless transmission of acoustic information; cellular phones; communications computers; communications servers; communications software for connecting computer network users; computer hardware and software used for the control of voice controlled information and communication devices; computer software for communicating with users of hand-held computers; computer software for wireless content delivery; devices for wireless radio transmission; digital cellular phones; downloadable music via the internet and wireless devices; electronic and optical communications instruments and components, namely, digital transmitters; integrated circuits and integrated circuit cores for use in wireless communications and wireless communication equipment and apparati and digital signal processors (DSP); mobile computing and operating platforms consisting of data transceivers, wireless networks and gateways for collection and management of data; modems; MP3 players; telecommunications and data networking hardware, namely devices for transporting and aggregating voice, data, and video communications across multiple network infrastructures and communications protocols; telematics apparatus, namely, wireless Internet devices which provide telematic services and have a cellular phone function; wireless telephones; computer hardware, namely, a handheld device that can communicate physically with a wireless network device; computer hardware, namely, a wireless enabling device that can communicate physically with a plurality of devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Cellular telephone services; communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers and wireless devices; communications by computer terminals; communications services, namely, transmitting streamed sound and audio-visual recordings via the Internet; computer aided transmission of information and images; mobile telephony; electronic mail services; electronic message transmission; mobile media services in the nature of electronic transmission of entertainment media content; provision of access to the internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |