Drawing for MUSICORE

USPTO serial 77433436

MUSICORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MUSICORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary D. Krugman

GARY D. KRUGMAN SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE. NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Semiconductor components, integrated circuits, semiconductor chips, semiconductor chip sets, circuit board assemblies, electronic computer components, electronic components for computers; all the aforesaid goods being for communications; control software for controlling the operation of a coprocessor from a central processing unit, interface software for implementing a link between a coprocessor and a central processing unit, communications software for implementing a wireless communication scheme that allows two devices to exchange data, music and/or voice; semiconductor component layouts in electronic form, namely, electronic documentation specifying printed circuit board designs, schematics, reference designs and example/sample designs; microprocessors; digital signal processorsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 16, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 25, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 25, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 13, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 21, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 15, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 26, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 26, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 22, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 14, 2008AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
May 12, 2008PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
May 6, 2008AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
May 6, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 5, 2008PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Apr 1, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Mar 31, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance