USPTO serial 77433485
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
BAKERSFIELD, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
PARAMOUNT CITRUS PACKING COMPANY LLC
LOS ANGELES, CA
Other trademarks owned by PARAMOUNT CITRUS PACKING COMPANY LLC
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Alasko Frozen Foods Inc./Aliments Congelés Alasko Inc.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by Alasko Frozen Foods Inc./Aliments Congelés Alasko Inc.
Alasko Frozen Foods Inc./Aliments Congelés Alasko Inc.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by Alasko Frozen Foods Inc./Aliments Congelés Alasko Inc.
Alasko Frozen Foods Inc./Aliments Congelés Alasko Inc.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by Alasko Frozen Foods Inc./Aliments Congelés Alasko Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Farah P. Bhatti, Esq.
Farah P. Bhatti, Esq. Buchalter Nemer, A Professional Corporation18400 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 800Irvine, CA 92612UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | PACKAGED FRUIT FROZEN IN INDIVIDUAL SECTIONS, EITHER WHOLE OR CUT IN PIECES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 29, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 29, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |