Drawing for PIXEL3

USPTO serial 77434066

PIXEL3

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIXEL3?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vanessa A. Ignacio

VANESSA A. IGNACIO LOWENSTEIN SANDLER PC65 LIVINGSTON AVENUEROSELAND, NJ 07068UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Video transmission apparatus; computer telephony software and video messaging software; computer programs for editing images, sound and video; webcameras; wireless telephony apparatusACTIVE
038Providing facilities and equipment for video conferencing; streaming of audio and video material on the Internet; teleconferencing and video conferencing services; internet telephony services; mobile telephonyACTIVE
040Digital image correction services of videos; digital enhancement of films and videos; reformatting of media for streaming deliveryACTIVE
042Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software that facilitates video and voice communications between parties over the Internet and wireless devices; computer software development; design and development of multimedia software and products; design and development of wireless communication systems for transmission and reception of voice, data and video; research, development and consultation related thereto in the fields of video and imaging technology and multimedia communicationsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 23, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 31, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 21, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 21, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 13, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 3, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 2, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Apr 1, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance