USPTO serial 77434977
MILEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MILEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norman Zafman
NORMAN ZAFMAN BLAKELY, SOKOLOFF, TAYLOR & ZAFMAN, LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 700LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1040UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Bakery goods; mixes for making bakery goods; candy; bread; burritos; cakes; chocolate; cinnamon; coffee; cookies; cookie dough; cocoa; corn chips; breakfast cereals; edible ices; flavoring syrup; flavorings; food seasonings; frostings; fruit jellies; fudge; gelato; granola; granola snacks; ice cream; ice cream drinks; macaroni; maple syrups; muffins; nachos; noodles; oatmeal; pancakes; pasta; pastries; pita; pizza; pizza sauce; puddings; relish; rice; rolls; salsa; sandwiches; scones; seasonings; shakes; sherbet; sorbet; sugar; sushi; tacos; taco shells; toffee; tortillas; vanilla; vanilla beans; waffles; yerba mate; candies; licorice; marshmallows; chewing gum; cereal based, rice based and grain based snack foods; popcorn; pretzels; crackers; salad dressings; sauces; frozen confections; teas; frozen meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; pre-packaged meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; spices, honey, salt, pepper, processed herbs, mustard; ketchup | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Energy drinks; drinking, bottled, mineral and sparkling water; fruit juices; fruit punch; non-alcoholic carbonated beverages; sports drinks; vegetable juices; soft drinks; herbal juices; non-alcoholic cocktail mixes; punch; soda water; smoothies; syrups for making soft drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SMILEY MILEY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Cyrus, Destiny Hope
- Other trademarks owned by Cyrus, Destiny Hope
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named MILEY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 3, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 3, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 22, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |