USPTO serial 77436266
M MOROCCANOIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with M MOROCCANOIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark D. Kremer
Mark D. Kremer Conkle, Kremer & Engel PLC3130 Wilshire BlvdSuite 500Santa Monica, CA 90403Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, skin cleansers, skin toners, skin moisturizers, anti-aging cream, eye cream, beauty masks, body creams, face creams, hand creams, non-medicated foot creams; makeup, namely, eye makeup, foundation makeup, makeup pencils, makeup powder, makeup preparations, lipstick; nail care products, namely, nail enamels, nail polish, nail polish removers, non-medicated cuticle creams; sun care lotions, hair sprays; bath and shower products, namely, soaps and shampoos; skiing care products, namely, skin creams, skin moisturizing preparations, sun care lotions; personal care products, namely, creams, lotions, gels, oils, cleaners and moisturizing masques for the hair and skin | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Hair salon services; nail care salon services; professional hair salon services; professional hair salon services, namely, treatments to protect hair from effects of exposure to sunlight, heat, humidity, and chlorinated water; manicure and pedicure services; salon services, namely, facials; body treatments, namely, cosmetic body care services in the nature of body wraps; spa professional services, namely, beauty spa services in the nature of body care | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MOROCCANOIL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MOROCCANOIL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by 3903150 CANADA, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named M MOROCCANOIL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 3, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |