USPTO serial 77436563
ACCAIRMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITE, RICHARD F
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - SLIE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ACCAIRMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK HARRISON
MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLPP.O. BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20045-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 3, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |