USPTO serial 77436694
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sandra M. Koenig
Sandra M. Koenig Fay Sharpe LLP1228 Euclid Avenue, 5th FloorCleveland, OH 44115UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | paper coating machines, namely, motorized drawdown coaters; laminators, namely, laminating machines for industrial use, hot roll laminators, bench top laminators and hot melt coaters and laminators; laminating machines for industrial use, namely, rolldown machines; laminating and coating machines sold as a unit | ACTIVE | Oct 2, 1992 |
| 009 | testing equipment for laboratory and industrial use, namely, adhesion and release testers, tack testers, shear testers, tensile testers, shear and test weights, namely, weights for use with shear and testing machines; laboratory measuring and physical testing equipment, namely, unwind testers; package testers, namely, apparatus for applying physical loads to a package to test the integrity of the package; peel testers, namely, apparatus for applying force to a peel-off lid of a container to determine the amount of strength required to peel the lid off the container; equipment for preparing and collecting samples of adhesives, coatings, sealants, specialty inks and packaging materials products, namely, drawdown coaters and hot melt coaters; laboratory equipment, namely, calibration weights for adhesion testers; software for test data management; physical testing and measuring equipment, namely, tack testers and equipment for measuring tack properties, namely, rolling ball tack testers, probe tack testers, loop track testers and probe material analyzers; laboratory measuring and physical testing equipment, namely, shear testers and equipment for measuring shear properties, namely, room temperature shear testers, high temperature shear testers and integrated oven shear testers; laboratory measuring and physical testing equipment, namely, tensile testers and equipment for measuring tensile properties and tensile strength, namely, tensile and compression testers; laboratory measuring and physical testing equipment, namely, unwind testers and equipment for measuring unwinding and unwind resistance properties, namely, high speed unwind testers; laboratory measuring and physical testing equipment, namely, package testers and equipment for measuring packaging properties, namely, peel adhesion testers and lid peel strength testers; laboratory measuring and physical testing equipment, namely, peel testers and equipment for measuring peel properties, namely, peel adhesion testers and lid peel strength testers; laboratory measuring and physical testing equipment, namely, surface testing equipment, namely, electrical equipment for testing contact angle, coefficient of friction, thickness, release, unwind resistance, tensile strength, elongation, seal strength; laboratory measuring and physical testing equipment, namely, burst strength testers; coefficient of friction testers; laboratory measuring and physical testing equipment, namely, peel adhesion testers; micrometers; laboratory measuring and physical testing equipment, namely, work to yield testers; electric ovens for laboratory use; electrostatic coating machines; metal and non-metal standard test panels for use in testing adhesives, coatings, sealants, specialty inks and packaging materials products; stainless steel panels for use in laboratory testing of adhesives, coatings, sealants, specialty inks and packaging materials; laboratory equipment for materials analysis of adhesives, coatings, sealants, specialty inks and packaging materials products, namely, coefficient of friction testers, burst and performance testers and high speed release testers; surface energy measurement devices, namely, contact angle meters for testing the surface energy of adhesives, coatings, sealants, specialty inks and packaging materials products | ACTIVE | Oct 2, 1992 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 8, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 2, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 16, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 3, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 21, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |