USPTO serial 77437704
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth F. Janda
Elizabeth F. Janda BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.1000 TOWN CTRSTE 2200SOUTHFIELD, MI 48075-1238| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Automobiles featuring environmentally-friendly technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 29, 2012 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |