Drawing for BTENDO

USPTO serial 77438022

BTENDO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
VENGROFF, MARILYN
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BTENDO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

aoi nawashiro

AOI NAWASHIRO BROWDY AND NEIMARK, PLLC624 9TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009projectors, namely, personal projectors for projecting all contents that can be projected by a projector, namely, photos, slides, video clips, movies, trailers, computer-generated visual presentations, messages, stored and archived information and data; and projecting modules for use in the aforementioned projectors; dashboard projectors; computational and computer accessories, namely calculators, keyboards, virtual laser keyboards, blank external disks, mouse, joysticks; televisions; computer monitors, laptop computer monitors, TV displays; electronic signage systems, namely, road signs, parking signs, commercial signs, signs indicating public establishments; electronic billboards signs; electronic games adapted for use with TV sets; electronic maps recorded on portable memory media; navigation systems for cars, trucks, ships and airplanes; laser pointers; electronic timing and weather indicating devices, namely stand-alone meteorological detection systems comprising meteorological instruments; electronic video recorders; burglar detectors; barcode readers; cameras and thermal inspection cameras; and computer operating system programs for operating all of the aforementioned goodsABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2011MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION
Jan 11, 2011ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Dec 28, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Oct 14, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Sep 14, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 11, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 10, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 31, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 31, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 31, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 22, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Feb 19, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 19, 2010DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED
Feb 19, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 28, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 27, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 27, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Aug 27, 2009CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 27, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Aug 17, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Feb 17, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Feb 16, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Feb 4, 2009ZZBXALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-INADVERTENTLY ISSUED ACTION
Feb 4, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 15, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 15, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 15, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 13, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 7, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance