USPTO serial 77438022
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Kfar Saba 44643, IL
Kfar Saba 44643, IL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
aoi nawashiro
AOI NAWASHIRO BROWDY AND NEIMARK, PLLC624 9TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | projectors, namely, personal projectors for projecting all contents that can be projected by a projector, namely, photos, slides, video clips, movies, trailers, computer-generated visual presentations, messages, stored and archived information and data; and projecting modules for use in the aforementioned projectors; dashboard projectors; computational and computer accessories, namely calculators, keyboards, virtual laser keyboards, blank external disks, mouse, joysticks; televisions; computer monitors, laptop computer monitors, TV displays; electronic signage systems, namely, road signs, parking signs, commercial signs, signs indicating public establishments; electronic billboards signs; electronic games adapted for use with TV sets; electronic maps recorded on portable memory media; navigation systems for cars, trucks, ships and airplanes; laser pointers; electronic timing and weather indicating devices, namely stand-alone meteorological detection systems comprising meteorological instruments; electronic video recorders; burglar detectors; barcode readers; cameras and thermal inspection cameras; and computer operating system programs for operating all of the aforementioned goods | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2011 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | ZZBX | ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-INADVERTENTLY ISSUED ACTION | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |