USPTO serial 77440230
TEMO HEALTHSMART BASEMENT SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3768176Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 30, 2010
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TEMO HEALTHSMART BASEMENT SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Clinton Township, MI
Clinton Township, MI
Clinton Township, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca L. Wilson
Rebecca L. Wilson The Dobrusin Law Firm, PC29 West Lawrence StreetSuite 210Pontiac, MI 48342Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation, Renovation, Remodeling, Repair, And Construction Improvements Of Residential, Commercial, And Industrial Properties, And Subterranean Spaces | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 28, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 30, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 16, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 19, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 29, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 29, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |