USPTO serial 77440678
LUSH FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4007694Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 2, 2011
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LUSH FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marc E. Hankin
MARC E. HANKIN HANKIN PATENT LAW, APC11414 THURSTON CIRLOS ANGELES, CA 90049-2435UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Canned or bottled fruits; Dried fruits; Preserved fruits; Frozen fruits; Fruit salads; Fruit topping; Fruit-based snack food; Fruit preserves; Fruit conserves; Potato chips; Lentils; Pickled vegetables; Pickles; Potato crisps; Potato pancakes; Preserved truffles; Processed pumpkin seeds; Processed almonds; Processed coconut; Edible oils; Candied fruit; Candied fruit snacks; Candied nuts; Salad oil; Processed nuts; Caviar; Bacon; Beef; Corned beef; Roast beef; Bologna; Chicken; Seafood; Soups; Bouillon; Broth; Soup mixes; Cheese; Cheese spreads; Cheese substitutes; Cheese and cracker combinations; Milk; Non-dairy creamer; Acidophilus milk; Chocolate milk; Cream; Egg nog; Egg substitute; Eggs; Margarine; Margarine substitutes; Sour cream substitutes; Sour cream; Whipping cream; Yogurt; Processed garlic; Vegetable chips; Peanut butter | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 2007 |
| 030 | Fruit sauces excluding cranberry sauce and applesauce; Cracker and cheese combinations; Processed garlic for use as seasoning; Coffee beans; Tea; Tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring; Honey; Chocolate; Flour; Wheat flour; Bran; Pastries; Pastry; Molasses; Barbecue sauce; Biscuits; Bread; Bread rolls; Bread sticks; Breakfast cereals; Brioches; Buns; Burritos; Cake mixes; Cakes; Candy cake decorations; Chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; Chocolate powder; Chocolate syrup; Chocolate topping; Chocolate truffles; Chocolate-based fillings for cakes and pies; Chow mein noodles; Chutney; Cinnamon; Cocoa; Cocoa mixes; Cones for ice cream; Cookies; Corn chips; Corn curls; Corn flakes; Corn meal; Corn syrup; Couscous; Crackers; Crepes; Crumpets; Crystallized ginger; Curry; Curry pastes; Curry powder; Custard-based fillings for cakes and pies; Custards; Danish pastries; Dessert souffles; Frozen confections; Frozen custards; frozen entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice; Frozen yogurt; Fruit ice; Fruit pies; Maple syrup; Marinades; Mayonnaise; Meat pies; Mincemeat pies; Minced garlic; Mixes for bakery goods; Muffins; Mustard; Noodles; Nutmeg; Oatmeal; Pancake mixes; Pancakes; Parfaits; Pasta; Pasta salad; Pasta shells; Confectionery chips for baking; Pepper; Pickle relish; Pies; Pizza; Pizza sauce; Popped popcorn; Pot pies; Powdered garlic; Ravioli; Ready to eat, cereal derived food bars; Relish; Rice; Rice salad; Rice-based snack foods; Rolled oats; Rusks; Snack mix consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, candied nuts and/or popped popcorn; Sorbet; Soy sauce; Soy-based ice cream substitute; Spaghetti; Spaghetti and meatballs; Spaghetti sauce; Spices; Sugar; Taco chips; Tamales; Tartar sauce; Coffee | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 2007 |
| 031 | Fresh wheat; Raw wheat; Raw nuts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 23, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |