USPTO serial 77440906
SYNCHRONICITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3906128Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 18, 2011
- Examiner
- EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SYNCHRONICITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hartsburg, MO, US
Hartsburg, MO, US
Hartsburg, MO, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry with two separate French curve lines connecting at two points | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 5, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2026 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 12, 2021 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2021 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 5, 2021 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2021 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Apr 19, 2021 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 2, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |