Drawing for PURELY SCANDINAVIAN

USPTO serial 77441190

PURELY SCANDINAVIAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WILSON, MARYNELLE WEST
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PURELY SCANDINAVIAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TUNDE NEMETH

TUNDE NEMETH Smuglers LLP480 Lisgar StreetOttawa, ON, K1R5H3CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics, namely, make-up, perfumery, deodorants, skin care preparations, hair removal preparations, shaving preparations, non-medicated lip care preparations, hair care preparations, nail care preparations, nail polish, sun block preparations, sun block patches for use on the skin; UV protection preparations, namely, sunscreen creams; toothpaste, tooth polish, tooth washes, tooth brightening preparations, and cosmetic preparations for the care of mouth and teeth; kits for home formulation of cosmetic preparations comprising essential oils, botanical oils, waters, bases, preservatives, antioxidants, peptides, peptide matrices, and serums; makeup kits comprising lipstick, blush and mascara; fragrances, namely, room fragrances, pet fragrances, fragrances for automobiles, and fragrances for personal useACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 6, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 4, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 29, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 29, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 29, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Jan 20, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Aug 24, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 20, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 20, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 20, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 20, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jan 20, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 20, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 13, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Jul 14, 2014GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 14, 2014GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 14, 2014CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Jul 14, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jan 14, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 14, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 14, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jan 13, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 13, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 9, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Jan 8, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jan 8, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jan 8, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 24, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 3, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
May 27, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
May 21, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Nov 21, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 21, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 21, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Nov 5, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
May 7, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 2, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 2, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 2, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Apr 18, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 18, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 15, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Oct 25, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 25, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 25, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Oct 18, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Apr 18, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 18, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 18, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Mar 29, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 29, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 23, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Nov 16, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 16, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 16, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Oct 1, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Oct 1, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 31, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 31, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 31, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Mar 11, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 11, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 10, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Sep 14, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 14, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 14, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Aug 25, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Feb 25, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 25, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 25, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Feb 25, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 24, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 24, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 24, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 24, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 26, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 26, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 26, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 10, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance