Drawing for 2-IN-1 MASSAGE CREME

USPTO serial 77441440

2-IN-1 MASSAGE CREME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MAI, TINA HSIN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 2-IN-1 MASSAGE CREME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jake D. Feldman

JAKE D. FELDMAN JOHNSON & JOHNSON1 JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PLZNEW BRUNSWICK, NJ 08933-0002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003massage oils, cream, lotions and gelsACTIVE
005personal lubricants; vaginal moisturizers; topical preparations for enhancing sexual arousalACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Sep 22, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Sep 22, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Sep 22, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Sep 12, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 12, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 25, 2009RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Aug 25, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Aug 20, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Aug 20, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 20, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Aug 20, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Feb 23, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 20, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 18, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Feb 13, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Feb 2, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 2, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 31, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 28, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 28, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 11, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Apr 10, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance