CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for UNICO FINEST HOTELS

USPTO serial 77442411

UNICO FINEST HOTELS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNICO FINEST HOTELS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael A. Lisi

MICHAEL A. LISI HONIGMAN MILLER SCHWARTZ AND COHN LLP38500 WOODWARD AVESTE 100BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5048

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Hotel services, rental of rooms in hotels and guesthouses; travel agency services, namely, making bookings for hotels and guesthouses; bar services, café and restaurant services, snack bar servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 21, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 20, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 20, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 3, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 3, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 9, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 2, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 17, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 25, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 5, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 17, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 15, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 9, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 18, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 18, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 18, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 18, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 3, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 1, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 29, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 11, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance