USPTO serial 77442535
PEBBLE BEACH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEBBLE BEACH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Y. Kim
Diane Goldman Pebble Beach CompanyP.O. Box 17672700 17-Mile DrivePebble Beach, CA 93953Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Arranging and conducting auctions in the field of wines; organizing and conducting charity auctions for charitable fundraising purposes; advertising services, namely, promoting the food and wine of others; promoting the goods and services of others by arranging for sponsors to affiliate their goods and services with a wine and food celebration, a sports competition and wine auctions; and promoting public awareness of fine wine and cuisine | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, wine and food tastings; conducting entertainment exhibitions in the nature of wine and food festivals; arranging and conducting classes, seminars and workshops in the fields of wine, wineries, cooking, chefs and food, and distribution of course materials in connection therewith; cooking demonstrations; educational demonstrations; providing entertainment information, news and commentary in the field of wine and food tastings; and entertainment in the nature of golf tournaments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pebble Beach Company
- Other trademarks owned by Pebble Beach Company
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named PEBBLE BEACH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 6, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |