USPTO serial 77443814
QUICKSNAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUICKSNAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald W. Margolis
DONALD W. MARGOLIS MARGOLIS & ASSOCIATESPO BOX 20338BOULDER, CO 80308-3338UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer consultation; Computer consultation in the field of computer security; Computer disaster recovery planning; Computer hardware and software consulting services; Computer services, namely, managing web sites for others; Computer services, namely, online scanning, detecting, quarantining and eliminating viruses, worms, trojans, spyware, adware, malware and unauthorized data and programs on computers and electronic devices; Computer software consultation; Computer systems analysis; Computer virus protection services; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Data warehousing; Design and maintenance of computer sites for third parties; Development of technologies for the fabrication of circuits for wireless communication, electronic data processing, consumer electronic, automotive electronics; Integration of computer systems and networks; Maintenance of computer software; Recovery of computer data; Technical consulting and assistance with computer-based information systems and components; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; Updating and maintenance of computer software | ACTIVE | Oct 11, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 23, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |