USPTO serial 77446079
LITTLE FEET SHOULD LEAVE LITTLE FOOTPRINTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3978474Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 14, 2011
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LITTLE FEET SHOULD LEAVE LITTLE FOOTPRINTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey Spear
JEFFREY SPEAR ORR & RENO, P.A.1 EAGLE SQCONCORD, NH 03301-4903UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Fitted one piece, cotton, quilted slip cover designed to cover the entire seating area, including handlebars, back, sides and seat of grocery/shopping carts for the purpose of protecting babies and toddlers from the metal and germs thereon, all of the foregoing goods of organic composition | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2010 |
| 024 | fabric cloth of organic composition for use while burping a baby | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2010 |
| 025 | baby bodysuits; baby bottoms; baby tops; baby bibs not of paper, all of the foregoing goods of organic composition | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Babe Ease, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Babe Ease, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Babe Ease, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named LITTLE FEET SHOULD LEAVE LITTLE FOOTPRINTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 11, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 30, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 28, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 5, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |