USPTO serial 77449117
WILD HARVEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3815034Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 6, 2010
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WILD HARVEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | baby foods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 23, 2008 |
| 029 | canned tomatoes; applesauce; peanut butter; frozen vegetables; milk; yogurt; butter; rice-based food beverage used as a milk substitute; soy milk; meats; eggs; canned vegetables; edible oils; soups; frozen meals consisting primarily of meat, poultry and vegetables | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 6, 2008 |
| 030 | teas; cocoa; cappuccino mix; salad dressings; tortilla chips; macaroni and cheese; tomato sauce; ketchup; pasta sauces; mustard; candy; oatmeal; seasonings; granola snacks; processed cereals; popcorn; breads; coffee; pizza; salsa; crackers; cookies; maple syrup; honey; pasta; rice; sugar; non-alcoholic tea beverages with fruit flavor | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 22, 2008 |
| 031 | Fresh vegetables; unprocessed cereals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 24, 2008 |
| 032 | Fruit juices; lemonades | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 22, 2008 |
| 035 | retail and online grocery store services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 9, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SUPERVALU LICENSING LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SUPERVALU Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SUPERVALU Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SUPERVALU Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named WILD HARVEST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2021 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 3, 2015 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2015 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 2, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 26, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 11, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 16, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2008 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 28, 2008 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 28, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |