Drawing for GINNY H

USPTO serial 77451484

GINNY H

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GINNY H?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony Scardino, Esquire

Anthony Scardino, Esquire Kranjac Manuali & Viskovic LLP40 Wall Street28th FloorNew York, NY 10005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumes, colognes, toilet waters, perfumed body milks, body lotions, body gels, body oils, perfumed soaps, bath and shower gel, powder and soaps for personal use, perfumed moisturizing creams and deodorants for the bodyACTIVE—
014Jewelry and watchesACTIVE—
018Handbags, all purpose carrying bags, tote bags, traveling bags, shoulder bags, clutch purses, all-purpose athletic bags, backpacks, wallets, coin purses and cosmetic bags sold emptyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 12, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 12, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 12, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 13, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 13, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 13, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 14, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 21, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 1, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 13, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 31, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 29, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 25, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 25, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance