USPTO serial 77457476
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
SEATTLE, WA
SEATTLE, WA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eugene M. Pak
EUGENE PAK DLA PIPER LLP (US)555 MISSION STREET, SUITE 2400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software used for cash management, accounting, account payments, and the processing and management of accounts, payroll and other payments and disbursements; computer software for the processing, transmission, management and analysis of healthcare claims, payments, and information; computer software for the aggregation, analysis, management, dissemination and distribution of customer, client, and subscriber account information | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 7, 2008 |
| 035 | Business consulting services to improve integration and efficiency of financial and administrative systems of others; business consulting services in the field of cash management, accounting, account payments, and the processing and management of accounts, payroll and other payments and disbursements; business consulting services in the field of processing, transmission, management and analysis of healthcare claims, payments, and information; business management consulting and advisory services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 7, 2008 |
| 042 | Information technology consulting services to improve integration and efficiency of financial and administrative systems of others; technology consulting services in the field of cash management, accounting, account payments, and the processing and management of accounts, payroll and other payments and disbursements; information technology consulting services in the field of processing, transmission, management and analysis of healthcare claims, payments, and information; application service provider, namely, providing, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, software, web sites, and databases in the field of management, accounting, account payments, and the processing and management of accounts, claims, customer and patient information, payroll and other payments and disbursements application service provider, namely, providing, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, software, web sites, and databases for the aggregation, analysis, management, dissemination and distribution of customer, client, and subscriber account information | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 7, 2008 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 10, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 17, 2009 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |