USPTO serial 77458055
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Evergreen Park, IL
Evergreen Park, IL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark K. Suri
MARK K SURI RYNDAK AND SURI LLP200 WEST MADISON STREETSUITE 2100CHICAGO, IL 60606| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Interactive computer driven communication kiosks, namely, a dedicated personal messaging system comprised primarily of computer hardware and a video monitor connected to a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2007 |
| 028 | Exercise equipment, namely, stationary cycles, virtual reality training cycles, stationary skateboards, virtual reality training skateboards, stationary surf boards, virtual reality training surf boards | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2007 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2009 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |