USPTO serial 77462208
OCEAN TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 19, 2010
- Examiner
- PARK, JENNY K
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with OCEAN TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN G. JANOSKI
STEPHEN G. JANOSKI Stakeholder Brands, LLC900 Boucher AvenueAnnapolis, MD 21403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | SEAFOOD, FISH, SHELLFISH, CRUSTACEANS, LOBSTER, CRAB, NONE OF THE FOREGOING BEING LIVE; FISH FILLETS, CRAB MEAT; PREPARED SEAFOOD SUITABLE FOR USE AS APPETIZERS OR ENTREES; PACKAGE COMBINATIONS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF FISH, SEAFOOD, SHRIMP OR CRAB MEAT; PACKAGE COMBINATIONS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF FISH, SEAFOOD, SHRIMP, CRAB MEAT, OR PROCESSED VEGETABLES; PACKAGE COMBINATIONS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF FISH, SEAFOOD, SHRIMP OR CRAB MEAT, OR PROCESSED FRUITS; PACKAGED ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF FISH, SEAFOOD, SHRIMP OR CRAB MEAT; PACKAGED ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF FISH, SEAFOOD, SHRIMP, CRAB MEAT, OR PROCESSED VEGETABLES; PACKAGED ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF FISH, SEAFOOD, SHRIMP, CRAB MEAT, OR PROCESSED FRUITS; PREPARED APPETIZERS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF FISH, SEAFOOD, SHRIMP OR CRAB MEAT; PREPARED APPETIZERS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF FISH, SEAFOOD, SHRIMP, CRAB MEAT, OR PROCESSED VEGETABLES; PREPARED APPETIZERS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF FISH, SEAFOOD, SHRIMP, CRAB MEAT, OR PROCESSED FRUITS; FROZEN ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF FISH, SEAFOOD, SHRIMP OR CRAB MEAT; FROZEN ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF FISH, SEAFOOD, SHRIMP, CRAB MEAT, OR PROCESSED VEGETABLES; FROZEN ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF FISH, SEAFOOD, SHRIMP, CRAB MEAT, OR PROCESSED FRUITS; FROZEN APPETIZERS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF FISH, SEAFOOD, SHRIMP OR CRAB MEAT; FROZEN APPETIZERS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF FISH, SEAFOOD, SHRIMP, CRAB MEAT, OR PROCESSED VEGETABLES; FROZEN APPETIZERS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF FISH, SEAFOOD, SHRIMP, CRAB MEAT, OR PROCESSED FRUITS; COOKED VEGETABLES; PROCESSED VEGETABLES; FROZEN VEGETABLES; VEGETABLE SALADS; COOKED FRUITS, PROCESSED FRUITS, FROZEN FRUITS; FRUIT SALADS; FRUIT PULPS; FRUIT PEELS; CUT FRESH VEGETABLES, PACKAGED MIXED VEGETABLES; CUT FRESH FRUITS; PACKAGED MIXED DRIED FRUITS; DIPS, EXCLUDING SAUCES AND SALSAS; PREPARED OR FROZEN SOUPS; VEGETABLE BASED SNACK FOODS; FISH BASED SNACK FOODS; SEAFOOD BASED SNACK FOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES FEATURING SEAFOOD, FISH, SHELLFISH, CRUSTACEANS, CRAB AND CRAB MEAT; RETAIL AND WHOLESALE STORE SERVICES FEATURING SEAFOOD, FISH, SHELLFISH, CRUSTACEANS, CRAB AND CRAB MEAT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ocean Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ocean Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ocean Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named OCEAN TECH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 13, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 9, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 14, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |