USPTO serial 77470167
MOSAIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOSAIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rheda-Wiedenbruck, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
V.T. Giordano
V.T. GIORDANO VON MALTITZ DERENBERG KUNIN et al60 E 42ND STSTE 2446NEW YORK, NY 10165-0011Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Motor homes and structural vehicle parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |