USPTO serial 77474317
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Fountain Valley, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brett S. Adair
17595 MT. HERRMANN STREETFOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for interconnecting and managing wireless and wired local and wide area networks, namely, routers, access points, network client adapters, computer network switches, gateways, print servers and internet cameras; Computer and networking hardware and related voice communications software for connecting local and external networks and connecting computer network users to data networks, voice over Internet protocol (VOIP) networks and digital networks, namely, communications switching equipment, namely, local area networks (LAN) hardware, wide area networks (WAN) hardware, network hubs, network switches, network routers, telephone station sets, telephone line interface terminals, wide area network interface terminals and computer terminals for transfer of voice, data, multimedia and other real time applications for general business, commercial, personal and computer network use; Computer networking hardware and software for use in data storage, operation of computer applications and networks, recovery of data, data protection, data back-up, data encryption, data consolidation and data duplication/redundancy and network data sharing; Computer hardware and software used for internet threat management, network security, firewall, anti-virus, parental control, spam control, spyware blocking, phishing control, peer-to-peer control, content filtering, privacy control, identification theft control, network monitoring, application monitoring and application control; Telephone handsets, telephones, wireless telephones, wireless telephones, cellular telephones, mobile telephones, radio telephones, two-way radios, radio transmitters, radio receivers, radio transceivers, MP3 players, and Mobile phones incorporating a camera; Computer hardware and software for use in connecting computers with televisions, projectors, monitors or other display devices;computer networking hardware, wired and wireless, namely, computers and devices for use with televisions, projectors, monitors or other display devices enabled for receipt and transmission of information, namely, data, text, graphics, images, still and motion pictures, sound, music, audio, video, video games, and signals; Wired and wireless digital electronic devices for recording, capturing, displaying, organizing, transmitting, receiving, controlling, playing and/or reviewing text, data, image, audio and video files, namely, personal digital assistant (PDA), digital cameras, digital video cameras, MP3 players, digital audio tape players and recorders; Computer hardware and software for the processing, reproduction, conversion and streaming of video, audio and multimedia content; computer hardware and software for controlling the operation of audio and video devices and for viewing, searching, organizing, storing and/or playing audio, video, television, movies, photographs, music and other digital media content | ACTIVE | Aug 3, 1994 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |