Drawing for STREETSMART

USPTO serial 77475519

STREETSMART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STREETSMART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter N. Jansson

PETER N. JANSSON JANSSON SHUPE & MUNGER LTD.245 MAIN STRACINE, WI 53403-1034UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Electric lighting fixtures for illuminating roadwaysACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 5, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 5, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
May 18, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Mar 1, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 1, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Sep 1, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Sep 1, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 1, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 11, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 10, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 10, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jan 18, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 18, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 18, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 18, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jul 2, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 20, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
May 19, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance