USPTO serial 77495569
INNOVATION ZONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUONG, ANGELA GAW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INNOVATION ZONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph D. Lewis
JOSEPH D LEWIS BARNES & THORNBURG LLP1717 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWSUITE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Medical and scientific research in the field of Orthopaedics, orthopaedic surgery, computer assisted surgery, and osteoarthritis; Medical research; Scientific research | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 19, 2011 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2011 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2011 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2011 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |