USPTO serial 77498672
ELITEXC XTREME COMBAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELITEXC XTREME COMBAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Larry Rosales
12121 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1001LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1164UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | video game software in the fields of sports and entertainment, especially featuring martial arts, mixed martial arts, fights, fighters and athletes; video game cartridges and discs; computer game cartridges; digital video discs, digital versatile discs, laser video discs and CD-ROMs, all featuring sporting events, competitions, games, and programming in the area of mixed martial arts, martial arts, and fighting | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing and wearing apparel, namely, shirts, hats, caps, visors, warm-up suits, sweatsuits, sweatshirts, sweatpants, jogging suits, running shorts, workout pants and shorts, workout tops, tee shirts, tank tops, sleepwear, pajamas and loungewear, shorts, underwear, bandanas, swimming and bathing suits, wrist bands, blouses, pants, jackets, athletic uniforms, referee and officiating uniforms, sweaters, turtlenecks, mittens and gloves, jerseys, rain ponchos and jackets, long-sleeved shirts, jackets, jeans | ACTIVE | Apr 20, 2008 |
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, organizing and producing sporting events and competitions in the area of martial arts and mixed martial arts; entertainment services, namely, live stage shows and performances featuring sports, martial arts, and mixed martial arts; production of entertainment shows and events in the area of martial arts, fighting, and mixed martial arts for distribution via television, cable, satellite, audio and video media cartridges and discs, computer discs and other electronic means, mobile telephones and other mobile devices with and without telephony functionality and via global computer networks; production of entertainment and sports shows and related news and information programs; educational services, namely, providing information on the subject of sports and entertainment, namely, all aspects of mixed martial arts and fighters, including competitions, events, fighter rankings, fighter backgrounds, and fighting strategies; providing a website on global computer networks featuring information on the subject of sports and entertainment | ACTIVE | Apr 20, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ProElite, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ProElite, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ELITEXC XTREME COMBAT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 2, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 25, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 5, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 2010 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2010 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |