Drawing for FLEXILOGIC

USPTO serial 77500550

FLEXILOGIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FARRELL, ANNE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLEXILOGIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aaron A. Weiss

AARON A. WEISS STMICROELECTRONICS, INC./RICHARD LAW GROUP1310 ELECTRONICS DRCARROLLTON, TX 75006-7005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software for noise reduction, spatial and strength processing, temporal tracking and gesture recognition of touch input devicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 18, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 20, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 20, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 13, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 12, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 11, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 10, 2010EXPREX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED
Nov 17, 2009GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Nov 17, 2009GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Nov 17, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Sep 19, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 22, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jul 22, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jul 22, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jul 22, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jul 22, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jul 22, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jun 16, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 16, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 12, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jun 12, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 12, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 12, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Dec 15, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Dec 15, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 15, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 23, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 23, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 23, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 7, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 16, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 21, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Jun 20, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance