USPTO serial 77507420
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Zuelpich, DE
Zuelpich, DE
Zuelpich, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig T. Boyd
Craig T. Boyd IDEX Corporation1925 West Field CourtSuite 200Lake Forest, IL 60045| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Mechanical Power Jacks; Pumps, Namely, Compressed Air, Rotary, Acid and Vacuum Pumps; Lifting Installations for the Transport of Persons and Goods, Namely, Mechanical, Pneumatic and Hydraulic Lifts, and Vibration Dampers Being Machine Parts for use in controlling vibrations occurring in the lifts during operation; Lifting installations for the transport of goods in the nature of plastic inflatable bags for lifting and conveying sunken equipment; Lifting installations for the transport of goods, namely, inflatable, cylindrical cushions used to lift and roll heavy loads in the nature of aircrafts and automobiles; and Shock Absorbant Bags Used as Vibration Dampers Used in Conjunction with Scientific Apparatus and Machines, namely, a shock absorber for scientific machines in the nature of shock absorbent vibration damper bags; Liquid and Dust Vacuum Cleaners for Industrial Use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 1972 |
| 009 | Life Saving Equipment, namely, foldable pressure containers for divers in the nature of hyperbaric oxygen chambers for non-medical purposes, Pit Bags for Rescue of Persons Who Have Fallen in Wells, namely, inflatable floatation bags used to elevate individuals from wells, Lifting Bags for Rescue of Persons, namely, inflatable floatation bags used to raise collapsed structures, equipment, or aircraft to thereby permit the removal of persons, Floating Bags, namely, inflatable floating platforms that provide a floating surface on water for distressed individuals, Escape Slide and Jumping Sheets, namely, flexible escape slides and flexible jumping sheets used in connection with aircraft and boats to provide a means for escaping the aircraft or boat, Escape Chutes and Rescue Islands, namely, flexible sheets providing a means to escape a structure, aircraft, or ship, and inflatable floating platforms that provide a floating surface on water for distressed individuals; Fire Extinguishers; Safety Helmets; Safety Goggles; Protective Gas Masks; Potentiometers, namely, instruments for measuring electromotive force; Automatic By-Pass Valves, Gate Pressure Relief Valves, Pressure Relief Valves, Automatic Interruption Valves, Automatic Relief Valves, and Automatic Safety Check and Safety Valves, all for controlling and monitoring pressure in rescue and recovery equipment systems; automatic valves for use in by-pass, gate pressure, pressure reduction, relief, automatic safety check; automatic safety valve for flow shutoff in rescue and recovery equipment; Plastic automatic nozzles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 1972 |
| 017 | Moldable compounds for use in packaging and jointing; Non-Metallic Hoses and Pipes; Semi-Finished Plastic Casings, Namely, Protective Insulation Covers for Industrial Machinery in the nature of Pumps, Winches, Measuring Apparatus, Scales, Tariff Indicators, Liquid and Dust Exhausters; Nonmetallic Hoses and Pipes; Non-metal interior linings for containers in the nature of adhesive sealants; Leak Sealing Patches in the nature of polymer-based patching compounds for masonry and wood; Inflatable Non-Metal Seals for use in Sealing or Repairing Leaks in Pipes, Hoses, and Containers; Floating Antipollution Barriers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 1972 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 20, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 4, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |