USPTO serial 77507518
LINKCONDUCTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAGHANI, MAYUR C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LINKCONDUCTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANN LAMPORT HAMMITTE
ANN LAMPORT HAMMITTE LOWRIE LANDO & ANASTASI LLPONE MAIN STREET RIVERFRONT OFFICE PARKCAMBRIDGE, MA 02142UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Search engine optimization and intelligence services for search engine optimization professionals, namely, researching, tracking, analyzing, monitoring and optimizing search engine results and website visibility to improve inclusion and prominence in internet search engine results; Providing on-line search engine intelligence software, namely, non-downloadable software used for tracking, analyzing, monitoring, and optimizing search engine results and website visibility to improve inclusion and prominence in Internet search engine results | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CONDUCTOR, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CONDUCTOR, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LinkExperts, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LINKCONDUCTOR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 21, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 23, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 3, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |