USPTO serial 77511784
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
East Orange, NJ
East Orange, NJ
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Annie Tunheim
ANNIE TUNHEIM TUNHEIM LAW LLC2711 GAYLORD STREETDENVER, CO 80205-4621UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Aromatherapy lotions; Aromatherapy oils; Body butter; Body oils; Body sprays; Hair care lotions; Hair creams; Hair oils; Lip balm; Shea butter for cosmetic purposes; Shower gels | ABANDONED | Jan 31, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 4, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |