USPTO serial 77519574
ULTRABALANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ULTRABALANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L. Whitelaw
JENNIFER L. WHITELAW WHITELAW LEGAL GROUP3838 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTHTHIRD FLOORNAPLES, FL 34103-3590Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Botanical extracts for use in the manufacture of nutraceuticals; botanical extracts for use in the manufacture of nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals; chemical extracts and active principles extracted from medicinal plants for use in the manufacture of nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals, namely, chemical agents made from botanical extracts; chemical extracts and active principles extracted from medicinal plants for use in the pharmaceutical industry, namely, chemical agents made from botanical extracts or association of chemical extracts for use in the manufacture of pharmaceutical or nutraceutical products; botanical extracts for use in the manufacture of medicated preparations in the form of lotions, creams, and topical analgesics and anesthetics, tablets, capsules, pills, lozenges, inhalers, tincture, suppositories and ampule for injection; botanical extracts used in the manufacture of pharmaceutical preparations in the form of lotions, creams, and topical analgesics and anesthetics, tablets, capsules, pills, tincture, suppositories and ampule for injection; botanical extracts for use in the manufacture of pharmaceutical preparations in the form of lotions, creams, and topical analgesics and anesthetics, tablets, capsules, pills, tincture, suppositories and ampule for injection; botanicals and botanical blends, herbals and herbal blends, botanical extracts and botanical extract blends, flavor extracts and flavor extract blends, all natural chemical additives algal extracts and algal extract blends, all for use in the manufacture of nutritional supplements and vitamins; all natural chemical additives algal extracts or algal extract blends for use in the manufacture of nutritional and dietary supplements; mushroom, fungus, and spore extracts for use in food manufacture; herbal extracts for use in making cosmetics, algal extracts, or algal extract blends for use in making cosmetics; herbal extracts and blends used as an ingredient in the manufacture of functional foods and beverages; botanical extracts and blends used as an ingredient in the manufacture in functional foods or beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | Essential oils; fragrances; fragrances for personal use; and food flavorings prepared from essential oils made containing herbal or botanical extracts and blends; pre-moistened non-medicated personal hygiene wipes impregnated with cleansing compounds, namely, herpes relief wipes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HerbalScience Group, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by HerbalScience Group, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named ULTRABALANCE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |