USPTO serial 77525698
BURLINGTON HOUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BURLINGTON HOUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna J. Bunton
DONNA J. BUNTON NIXON & VANDERHYE P.C.901 NORTH GLEBE ROAD11TH FLOORARLINGTON, VA 22203-1853Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | HOME FRAGRANCES; ROOM FRAGRANCES, SACHET-LIKE PILLOWS CONTAINING FRAGRANCES, SCENTED FABRIC SPRAY | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | CANDLES, SCENTED CANDLES, PERFUMED CANDLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | FLATWARE, CUTLERY, STORAGE BOXES FOR CUTLERY AND FLATWARE | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | PICTURE FRAMES, ORNAMENTS OF BONE, IVORY, PLASTER, PLASTIC, WAX OR WOOD; WALL PLAQUES OF PLASTIC OR WOOD; FURNITURE; OUTDOOR FURNITURE; PILLOWS, DECORATIVE PILLOWS, MATTRESS PILLOWTOPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | HARD BATH ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, CUP HOLDERS SOAP DISHES, TOOTHBRUSH HOLDERS; LIQUID SOAP DISPENSERS; PILLAR CANDLE PLATES; CANDLE HOLDERS; CANDLESTICKS, CANDLE RINGS, FLOWER VASES; VASES, NAPKIN RINGS, TABLE PLACE CARD HOLDERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; BAKEWARE, SERVEWARE, NAMELY, SERVING FORKS, SERVING BOWLS, SERVING DISHES, SERVING LADLES, SERVING PITCHERS, SERVING PLATTERS, SERVING SPOONS, SERVING TRAYS, SERVINGWARE FOR SERVING FOOD; STEMWARE, DINNERWARE, DISHES, PLATES, CUPS; TABLE CENTERPIECES BEING PLATES OR VASES; HOUSEHOLD UTENSILS, NAMELY, POTS AND PAN SCRAPERS, ROLLING PINS, SPATULAS, TURNERS, WHISKS; CUTTING BOARDS, MIXING SPOONS, SERVING SPOONS, BASTING SPOONS, NON-ELECTRIC COFFEE POTS, NONELECTRIC TEA POTS, KITCHEN GADGETS, NAMELY, COASTERS NOT OF PAPER AND NOT BEING TABLE LINEN, CONTAINERS FOR HOUSEHOLD OR KITCHEN USE, NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | BEDSPREADS, BED LINEN; QUILTS, COMFORTERS, DOWN COMFORTERS, DUVETS, COVERLETS, BED SHEETS, PILLOWCASES, BED SHEET SETS, THROWS, MATTRESS COVERS; TOWELS, WASH CLOTHS, SHOWER CURTAINS, BATH RUGS; WINDOW CURTAINS; WINDOW COVERINGS; AND TREATMENTS, NAMELY, CURTAINS, DRAPERIES, SHEERS, SWAGS, VALANCES, POUFS, PUFFS, AND TEXTILE PANELS/WALL HANGINGS; TABLE LINEN, FABRIC TABLE RUNNERS, FABRIC TABLE TOPPERS, TABLE CLOTHS NOT OF PAPER, CLOTH COASTERS, TEXTILE NAPKINS, TABLE MATS NOT OF PAPER, TABLE PADS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BI Properties I Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BI Properties I Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named BURLINGTON HOUSE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 20, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 13, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |