Drawing for V V-MODA

USPTO serial 77528418

V V-MODA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with V V-MODA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edwin Tarver

Edwin Tarver LAUSON & TARVER LLP880 Apollo Street, Suite 301El Segundo, CA 90245UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumes and colognesACTIVE
014Bracelets; Jewelry chains; Pendants; Rings; WatchesACTIVE
015GuitarsACTIVE
018Duffle bags; Messenger bags; WalletsACTIVE
035Retail store services featuring cologne, perfume, watches, pendants, jewelry chains, rings, bracelets, wallets, duffle bags, messenger bags, earphones and headphones, digital materials, namely, CDs, DVDs, and digital audio files featuring music, downloadable podcasts in the field of music, microphones, sunglasses, guitars, shirts, hats, beanies, caps, jackets, dress shirts, sweat shirts, t-shirts, pants, jeans, shorts, dresses, blouses, belts, athletic shoes, shoes, scarves and bandanasACTIVE
038Podcasting servicesACTIVE
041Entertainment services, namely, providing podcasts in the field of musicACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 21, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 21, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 21, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 9, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 17, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Nov 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 14, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 13, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 17, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Mar 17, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 17, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 17, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jan 26, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 26, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 26, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 20, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 20, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 16, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 4, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 25, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance