Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 77531925?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/77531925. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns WHISPER DRIVE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 77531925, the listed owner(s) include: Hunter Douglas Industries Switzerland GmbH.

What is USPTO serial number 77531925?

Serial number 77531925 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark WHISPER DRIVE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover WHISPER DRIVE?

The public record lists International Classes: 009. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 77531925

WHISPER DRIVE

Q: What is the current status of WHISPER DRIVE?

WHISPER DRIVE (77531925) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Jul 25, 2008
Status date: May 29, 2012
Registration date: —
Examiner: DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHISPER DRIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Hunter Douglas Industries Switzerland GmbH
Luzern, CH
Other trademarks owned by Hunter Douglas Industries Switzerland GmbH

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott S. Havlick

SCOTT S HAVLICK HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80201-8749UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
009	Motors for automated window shades, window blinds, draperies, and window shutters; electronic motor control switches for use in operating motors controlling window shades, window blinds, draperies, and window shutters	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
May 31, 2012	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
May 29, 2012	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
May 29, 2012	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Mar 15, 2012	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
Dec 16, 2011	GNSN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Dec 16, 2011	GNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Dec 16, 2011	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Oct 18, 2011	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Aug 16, 2011	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Aug 16, 2011	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Apr 4, 2011	RDX3	NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED	—
Apr 4, 2011	RDX1	ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED	—
Apr 4, 2011	RRDX	ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED	—
Mar 11, 2011	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Mar 10, 2011	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 10, 2011	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 16, 2011	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Feb 16, 2011	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 16, 2011	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 26, 2011	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jan 26, 2011	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jan 26, 2011	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 25, 2011	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 25, 2011	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2011	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2011	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2011	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2010	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Jun 16, 2010	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Jun 16, 2010	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Dec 3, 2009	GNS3	NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Dec 3, 2009	GNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Dec 3, 2009	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
Nov 27, 2009	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Nov 27, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Nov 27, 2009	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 27, 2009	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2009	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2009	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2009	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
May 5, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 5, 2009	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 5, 2008	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2008	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2008	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jul 29, 2008	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—