USPTO serial 77532690
SHENANDOAH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHENANDOAH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Harpers Ferry, WV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marcus A. Streips
MARCUS A . STREIPS ATTORNEY OF RECORD13327 FAIRFAX ROADHAGERSTOWN, MD 21742UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Living trees, namely, (Asimina triloba) Pawpaw tree named "Wansevwan" PP14,452 and raw fruit from said Papapw tree named "Wansevwan" | ACTIVE | Sep 17, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 26, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |