USPTO serial 77535747
PONY UP!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PONY UP!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Moncton, New Brunswick, CA
SPIELO INTERNATIONAL CANADA ULC
MONCTON, NEW BRUNSWICK, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David R. Josephs
DAVID R. JOSEPHS BARLOW, JOSEPHS & HOLMES, LTD.101 DYER ST FL 5PROVIDENCE, RI 02903-3926UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) Computer game software for gaming machines, namely, slot machines and video lottery terminals; Gaming machines, namely, slot machines and video lottery terminals (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Computer game software for gaming machines, namely, slot machines and video lottery terminals; Gaming machines, namely, slot machines and video lottery terminals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 2, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |