USPTO serial 77536611
CHIA BRAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHIA BRAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary L. Shapiro
MARY L. SHAPIRO TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREWTWO EMBARCADERO CENTER, 8TH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Herbal supplements; Nutraceuticals for use as a dietary supplement; Dietary and nutritional supplements; Dietary food supplements; Dietary supplemental drinks; Food supplements; Powdered nutritional supplement drink mix; Vitamin supplements; Nutritional energy bars for use as a meal substitute; medicinal edible oil extracts for use in vitamins and nutritional supplements; nutritional oils for use in vitamins and nutritional supplements; nutritional and medicinal edible oils for use as nutritional supplements | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Processed edible seeds; edible plant seed oil; plant seed-based food, namely, snack bars; Protein based, nutrient-dense snack bars; Nut and seed-based snack bars | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Breakfast cereals; Granola-based snack bars; Muffins and muffin tops | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Unprocessed grains for eating; agricultural grains for planting; live animals; fresh fruits and vegetables; natural plants seeds, and natural plants and flowers; food for animals, malt for brewing and distilling | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2011 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 11, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |