USPTO serial 77547564
BETTER THAN...
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3884707Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 7, 2010
- Examiner
- SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BETTER THAN...?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VAUGHAN, ONTARIO, CA
Concord, CA
Concord, CA
Concord, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacy L. Taylor
K-G SPRAY-PAK INC.8001 KEELE STREETVAUGHAN, ONTARIO, L4K1Y8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Automotive chemical products, namely, starting fluids, ignition spray, battery acid neutralizer, lock de-icer; mould-release preparations; anti-static spray for electronic equipment; spray adhesives for industrial purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 002 | Automotive coatings and sprays, namely, automotive undercoating, anti-rust spray, chip and stone guard and cold galvanized coating; anti-tarnish spray, namely, anti-tarnishing preparations for coating metals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 003 | Automotive cleaning products, namely, engine cleaner, glass cleaner, battery cleaner, brake parts cleaner, degreaser, carburetor and choke cleaner, rug shampoo, upholstery shampoo and salt remover; home and hardware cleaning products, namely, glass cleaner, furniture wax, furniture polish, stain remover, paint remover, contact cleaner, namely, electrical contact cleaner, gum remover, anti-static spray for household purposes, anti-slip spray liquids for floors, rug shampoo, spot remover, stainless steel cleaner, glass cleaner; industrial cleaning products, namely, mould die cleaner, tool and parts cleaner, and air dusters, namely, compressed air in cans for dusting; shoe care products, namely, aerosol protective spray and shoe cleaner | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 004 | Automotive products, namely, penetrating oil, non-silicone lubricant, silicone lubricant, lithium grease; industrial products, namely, chain lubricant, belt dressing, non-silicone lubricant and silicone lubricant | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Home and hardware products, namely, all-purpose disinfectant, room deodorant and insecticide; industrial products, namely, all-purpose disinfectant, air freshener and insecticide; shoe products, namely, deodorizer and disinfectant spray; skin barrier spray, namely, barrier lotion for protection from toxic oils of poisonous plants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by K-G SPRAY-PAK INC.
- Other trademarks owned by K-G Packaging, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by K-G Packaging, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by K-G Packaging, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named BETTER THAN...
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 7, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2016 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2016 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 25, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2016 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 21, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 22, 2010 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |