USPTO serial 77549713
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Giga-Byte Technology Co., Ltd.
New Taipei City 231, TW
Giga-Byte Technology Co., Ltd.
Taipei, TW
Giga-Byte Technology Co., Ltd.
Taipei, TW
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael T. Smith
Michael T. Smith BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH LLP8110 Gatehouse Road, Suite 100 EastFalls Church, VA 22042UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Personal computers; computer servers; notebook computers; portable laptop computers for note-taking; [ personal digital assistants; set-top boxes; ]computer motherboards; computer chassis; computer cables; computer thermal /cooling devices, namely, internal cooling fans for computers; computers, namely, thin client computers in the nature of computers which concentrate on providing graphical user interfaces to the end-users while the operating system is provided by servers, namely, thin client computers; computer software, namely, thin client software that primarily acts as a user interface for access to network servers; liquid crystal displays; computer add-on cards, namely, audio sound cards, computer fax modem cards, video graphic accelerator cards, LAN (local area network) cards for connecting portable computer devices to computer networks, network cards and SCSI (small computers systems interface) cards for data processing equipment in the form of printed circuits; computer workstations comprising desktop and laptop computers; [ CPUs; ] graphic cards and video graphic controllers; LAN hardware; [ computer hard drive interface controllers in the nature of integrated drive electronic and small computer system interface electronic controllers used to control data transfer to and from disk drives, namely, card controllers that plug into peripheral component interconnect and industry standard architecture slots, controllers that are for use in motherboards; ] computer hardware and computer peripherals, namely, computer printers, monitors, scanners, computer storage devices, namely, hard disks, floppy disk drives, mice, keyboards, optical disk drives; [ semiconductors; ] integrated circuits; printed circuit boards; power supplies electrical; electricity conduits; remote control devices for computers; telecommunications and data networking hardware, namely, devices for transporting and aggregating voice, data, and video communications across multiple network infrastructures and communications protocols; [ fax/modem devices, namely, fax devices and modems; cable modems; ] networking devices, namely, computer network adapters and switches, routers, hubs, bridges; [ video phones; ] video conference apparatus, namely, video camera or webcam, computer monitor, television or projector, microphones, loudspeakers associated with the display device or telephone, analog or digital telephone network, LAN or Internet, all packaged into a single piece of equipment for providing video conferencing over the Internet; [ digital TV; digital cameras; digital phones; ] mobile phones; [ electrical connector capacitors; ] passive components, namely, capacitors, electric resistors, electrical inductors; computer hard drive enclosures; video and multimedia projectors; slide projectors; photographic projectors; computer software, for computer hardware testing, application, and system software, software drivers, firmware for use in database management, use as a spreadsheet and word processing; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound and images | ACTIVE | Dec 21, 2006 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2021 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 20, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 19, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 7, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 5, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2016 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Jun 11, 2016 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 23, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 11, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 12, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |