USPTO serial 77550753
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Aktieselskabet af 21. November 2001
Brande, DK
Other trademarks owned by Aktieselskabet af 21. November 2001
Aktieselskabet af 21. November 2001
Brande, DK
Other trademarks owned by Aktieselskabet af 21. November 2001
Aktieselskabet af 21. November 2001
Brande, DK
Other trademarks owned by Aktieselskabet af 21. November 2001
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rhett V. Barney
Rhett V. Barney Lee & Hayes, PC601 W. Riverside Ave. Suite 1400Spokane, WA 99201UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CASUAL CLOTHING, namely, PANTS, SHORTS, T-SHIRTS; [ ATHLETIC CLOTHING, namely, JERSEYS, ATHLETIC UNIFORMS; ] EXERCISE CLOTHING, namely, [ TRAINING SUITS, ] SWEAT PANTS; [ RAINWEAR; GOLF WEAR, namely, GOLF SHIRTS, GOLF TROUSERS; ] SKI WEAR; [ FUR COATS AND JACKETS; ] COATS; JACKETS; SLEEVELESS JACKETS; SUITS; SHIRTS; SKIRTS; DRESSES; BLOUSES; BATHROBES; [ DRESSING GOWNS; ] CARDIGANS; SWEATERS; [ FORMAL WEAR FOR MEN, namely, SUITS, TUXEDOS; ] GLOVES; [ GYM SUITS; ] [ IMITATION LEATHER TROUSERS; ] IMITATION LEATHER SKIRTS; IMITATION LEATHER JACKETS; [ JERSEYS; ] [ KILTS; ] [ KNICKERBOCKERS; KNITWEAR, namely, KNIT SHIRTS, KNITTED CAPS, KNITTED UNDERWEAR; ] [ LEATHER TROUSERS; LEATHER SKIRTS; LEATHER JACKETS; ] OVERALLS; OVERCOATS; PARKAS; [ PLUS FOURS; POCKETS FOR CLOTHING; ] PULLOVERS; PAJAMAS; [ SCARVES; SHAWLS; STOLES; ] [ SASHES FOR CLOTHING; ] SHORTS; [ SINGLETS; ] [ SPORTS JERSEYS; SPORTS SHIRTS; ] [ TAILOR-MADE SUITS; ] TOPS; TROUSERS; T-SHIRTS; SWEATSHIRTS; TUNICS; VESTS; [ WAISTCOATS; ROMPERS; ] WATERPROOF GARMENTS, namely, WATERPROOF JACKETS, [ WATERPROOF PANTS; ] [ TIES; BELTS FOR CLOTHING; ] UNDERWEAR; [ ANTI-PERSPIRATION UNDERWEAR; ] [ GIRDLES; SLIPS; ] [ CAMISOLES; ] [ HALF SLIPS; ] [ PERSPIRATION ABSORBING UNDERWEAR; PETTICOATS; ] UNDERPANTS; [ UNDERSHIRTS; UNDERSKIRTS; ] [ CORSETS; BODY STOCKINGS; LONG UNDERWEAR; ] SOCKS; [ LEOTARDS; ] STOCKINGS; TIGHTS; [ BATHING CAPS; ] BATHING SANDALS; BATHING SHOES; BATHING WRAPS; BEACH SHOES; BEACHWEAR; [ SWIMMING CAPS; ] SWIMMING SUITS; SWIMMING TRUNKS; BIKINIS; SHOES; [ BOOTS; ] [ CLOGS; ] ATHLETIC FOOTWEAR; SLIPPERS; SANDALS; [ GYM SHOES; ] [ OUTDOOR WINTER FOOTWEAR; ] RAIN FOOTWEAR; [ EXERCISE FOOTWEAR; ] [ EVENING FOOTWEAR; ] [ BANDANAS; ] HATS; CAPS; [ EARMUFFS; ] HEADBANDS [ ; KERCHIEFS ] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2023 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 15, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 8, 2023 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Aug 24, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 5, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 29, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | 44EG | 44(e) PETITION - GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 19, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 14, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 7, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 15, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | ISER | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | UNTD | REQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2009 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2009 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |