USPTO serial 77553554
BIONIC POWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIONIC POWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd A. Rattray
TODD A. RATTRAY OYEN WIGGS GREEN & MUTALA LLP601 WEST CORDOVA STREET480-THE STATIONVANCOUVER, V6B1G1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | wearable energy conversion devices for converting mechanical energy associated with motion of a human joint into electrical energy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |