USPTO serial 77557722
CRAZY HORSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 2014
- Examiner
- EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with CRAZY HORSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cleveland, OH
Cleveland, OH
Cleveland, OH
CLEVELAND, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Zanghi
John S. Zanghi LIPPES MATHIAS LLPTHE HALLE BUILDING 5TH FLOOR1228 EUCLID AVENUECLEVELAND, OH 44115Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ONLINE ADULT ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING A WEBSITE FEATURING PICTURES AND INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF EXOTIC DANCING [ , AND FEATURING ARTICLES AND STORIES DEALING WITH ADULT THEMES ] ; ADULT ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, EXOTIC DANCING PERFORMANCES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Spencer, Frank B.
- Other trademarks owned by Spencer, Frank B.
- Other trademarks owned by Spencer, Frank B.
- Other trademarks owned by CRAZY HORSE LICENSING INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named CRAZY HORSE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2025 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2025 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 23, 2025 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 23, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Aug 31, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 14, 2014 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 14, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 2012 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 1, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2011 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |