USPTO serial 77563454
MOLE HILL MINES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, COLLEEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOLE HILL MINES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SPIELO INTERNATIONAL CANADA ULC
MONCTON, NEW BRUNSWICK, CA
Moncton, New Brunswick, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David R. Josephs
DAVID R. JOSEPHS BARLOW, JOSEPHS & HOLMES, LTD.101 DYER ST FL 5PROVIDENCE, RI 02903-3926UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game software for gaming machines, namely, slot machines and video lottery terminals; Gaming machines, namely, slot machines and video lottery terminals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 2012 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |