USPTO serial 77563484
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marybeth P. Mantharam
Marybeth P. Mantharam Colucci & Gallaher, P.C.424 Main Street, Room 2000Buffalo, NY 14202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Hospital management and administration services provided to hospital administrators, namely, developing, approving, implementing and overseeing Certificate of Need applications, managed care contracts, capital and operating budgets, strategic planning, unbudgeted expenditures, quality improvement programs, credentialing, shared services, affiliations with other health care providers, physician recruitment, regional health care services, marketing and advertising | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 2, 2010 |
| 044 | Hospitals; medical services; medical clinics; medical consultations; healthcare services; emergency hospital services, surgical medical services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 2, 2010 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 31, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 25, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 29, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |