USPTO serial 77563845
FLO FORUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLO FORUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fremont, CA
Fremont, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara L. Friedman
BARBARA L. FRIEDMAN HANSON BRIDGETT LLP425 MARKET ST FL 26SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-5401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Testing, analysis, and evaluation of goods and services of others for purposes of certifying products using Forward Link Only mobile broadcast technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 16, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |