USPTO serial 77564264
LOTOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACFARLANE, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOTOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott E. Thompson
SCOTT E. THOMPSON GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP200 PARK AVE FL 34NEW YORK, NY 10166-0005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for the operational management of games, namely, lottery games, computer games, video games, instant lottery games and online sports betting games, all of the foregoing not sold or offered to the general public in retail stores | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Telecommunication network management services for others, namely, the operation and administration of telecommunication networks for the purpose of providing lottery, pari-mutuel and betting services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Providing secure financial transaction processing services for lottery vendors, namely, check processing, credit card payment processing, debit card transaction processing services, cash payment processing | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Operation of lotteries, instant lotteries, numerical lotteries; betting services; administration of lotteries and games of chance for others; education services, namely, providing courses and seminars in the field of lottery operation, providing of training, namely, courses and seminars in the field of lottery systems operation, entertainment, namely, providing casino services, production of television shows; providing sporting and cultural activities, namely, organizing community sporting and cultural events | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 8, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |