USPTO serial 77564267
LOTOS OPEN SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOTOS OPEN SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott E. Thompson
SCOTT E. THOMPSON GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP200 PARK AVE FL 34NEW YORK, NY 10166-0005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for the operational management of games, namely, electronic lottery games, computer games, video games, instant lottery games and online sports betting games, all of the foregoing not sold or offered to the general public in retail stores | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Telecommunication network management services for others, namely, the operation and administration of wireless telecommunication networks for the purpose of providing lottery, pari-mutuel and betting services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Providing secure financial transaction processing services for lottery vendors, namely, check processing, credit card payment processing and debit card transaction processing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Operation of lotteries, instant lotteries, numerical lotteries; betting services; administration of lotteries and games of chance for others; education services, namely, providing courses and seminars in the field of lottery operation, providing of training, namely, courses and seminars in the field of lottery systems operation, entertainment, namely, providing casino services, production of television shows; providing sporting and cultural activities, namely, organizing community sporting and cultural events | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intralot SA
- Other trademarks owned by Intralot SA
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named LOTOS OPEN SYSTEM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 3, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 9, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |